THE
NOT-SO PRIVATE REPROVAL
The lowest level of discipline which can be imposed in a State Bar matter
is a private reproval. The Bar does
not affirmatively publicize the name of any lawyer who receives a private
reproval. This result is often appealing to those of my clients who dread the
thought of having their colleagues, local judges, competitors and potential
clients reading their name and misdeeds in the California Lawyer or other
legal publications. Another benefit
in either stipulating to or obtaining a private reproval at trial is that the
disciplined attorney does not have to pay either the State Bar Office of
Trials’ investigative and litigation costs, nor the separate costs assessed by
the State Bar Court. See Business
and Professions Code Section 6086.10.
However, a private reproval which is imposed either by way of stipulation
or decision after formal disciplinary charges have been filed is a public
record which can be obtained by anyone seeking the same.
As a result of a new Rule of Procedure effective July 1, 2000, the Bar
will disclose on its website that any attorney who receives a private reproval
after formal charges are filed “has a public record of discipline.”
This is the same designation the Bar places on its website for attorneys
who are suspended for four years, and can be accessed world-wide, 24 hours a
day! The Bar recently ceased its
practice of disclosing on its Website private reprovals entered into before July
1, 2000, since such reprovals pre-dated the change in the rules of procedure
even though a Los Angeles Superior Court judge had upheld the Bar’s practice
of disclosing such reprovals.
If, however, a stipulation for a private reproval is entered into prior
to the filing of formal disciplinary charges, the same is not a public record
and will not be listed as public discipline on the Bar’s website, nor will it
be otherwise disclosed publicly.
As such, one can see an important advantage in reaching an early
resolution of State Bar discipline investigations (other advantages include
minimizing legal fees, and removing the emotional and other distractions
associated with defending a formal disciplinary proceeding).